Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's overall score of 73.4. Galaxy S10e's body is incredibly lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy S10e, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 2 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a little better performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S10e takes much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.