Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having a overall score of 94.8 against 73.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Galaxy S20 counts with an incredibly better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and much more pixels per inch in the display. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The Galaxy S20 features a little better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy S20 features a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 12 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.