Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, with a global score of 90.8 against 73.4. The Galaxy S20 FE design is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a brighter screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater display pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE shoots much better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with lot less megapixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits up to 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.