Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 8.36 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a 76 score against 73.4. Galaxy S24 FE is a a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier device than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so both of them should give very similar OS features.
Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy S24 FE also has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a better pixels density. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 2 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have a 8 GB RAM memory, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has 7 more CPU cores. Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of them have a 50 megapixels camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.