Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, with an 82.6 score against 73.4. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. The Galaxy S25 design is thinner and extremely lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much better display pixel density.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 2 TB. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25. They have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have a 50 MP resolution camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.