Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has a global score of 80.9, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's score of 73.4. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. Galaxy S6 Active's body is a little thicker but way lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
Galaxy S6 Active features a much more vibrant screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much higher pixel count per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processor and an additional GPU.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot less mega pixels camera in the back. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.