Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a 79.5 score against 73.4. Galaxy S7's construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with a much lower resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.