Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a general score of 75.8 against 73.4. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a just a little bit lighter but somewhat thicker cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much more vibrant screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixel number per screen inch and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB and more internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S7 Active has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 12 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.