Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a 78.1 score against 73.4. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's body is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot more pixels per screen inch. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of 2200 MHz cores.
Galaxy S7 edge takes better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 12 MP resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 2 TB and 224 GB more internal storage.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.