Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, with a score of 81.9 against 73.4. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S8 Active is a just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better display pixels density and a much better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 2 TB. Galaxy S8 Active has a processor that is very similar to OSCAL Tiger 13's CPU, and although the Galaxy S8 Active has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S8 Active captures much clearer photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.