Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover 5 is slightly better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having a overall score of 78.1 against 73.4. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover 5 has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. Galaxy XCover 5 is a lighter but a little bit thicker cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a bit sharper screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little lower 720 x 1480 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels per screen inch. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a larger amount of RAM.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 2 TB. The Galaxy XCover 5 features a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with a lot worse 16 MP resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.