Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 8.36 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a 77.6 score against 73.4. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's body is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 13. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has an older 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels amount per display inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a higher amount of RAM.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. OSCAL Tiger 13 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13. They have a 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.