Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. The Galaxy Z Flip is a just a bit lighter and thinner phone than OSCAL Tiger 13. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a lot higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a lot better display pixels density.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip captures much better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.