Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.36 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is notably thinner and a little lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.