Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's overall score of 73.4. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is a lot heavier but a lot thinner than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.