Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 8.36 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, with a score of 90.6 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a a lot heavier but notably thinner phone than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a brighter display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.