Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. The Xperia XZ Premium design is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and way more pixels per inch of screen.
The Xperia XZ Premium has a little bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xperia XZ Premium takes much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 55% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.