Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a score of 81 against 73.4. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi 12S Ultra has the previous 12 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. Xiaomi 12S Ultra's construction is notably lighter and notably thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra counts with a way better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra also has a way better count of pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has an extremely better processor than Xiaomi 12S Ultra. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have a 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, because it has a 4% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.