Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a general score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 general score. Xiaomi Black Shark is a a bit thicker but just a bit lighter device than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark has newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version, so it counts with some additional features.
Xiaomi Black Shark features a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 13. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a lot greater pixel quantity per display inch.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 2 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark shoots much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.