Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. Even being the best phone we are comparing, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a thicker and a little bit heavier phone than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit faster processor than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a lot better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.