Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a 93.1 score against 73.4. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro's design is a bit heavier and a little thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a little better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a much sharper screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has a higher pixel density and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro captures greater videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.