Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a score of 85, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's global score of 73.4. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite construction is notably lighter and much thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite counts with a lot better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.