Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-05 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 56.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 8 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having an 83.3 score against 73.4. The Xiaomi Mi 8 is a thinner and lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 8 has the older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 has a much better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2248px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 8 counts with a bit better processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 8, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB. Xiaomi Mi 8 captures much clearer photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.