Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a general score of 81.4, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 global score. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's construction is thinner and notably lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14, giving you some additional features and some performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a much more vibrant screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way higher pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes greater videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 2 TB and 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.