Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13, having an 84.3 score against 73.4. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's construction is somewhat heavier but a lot thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in this review include the same Android 14 OS (operating system). OSCAL Tiger 13 features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a larger screen, a way greater screen pixels density and a much better resolution of 2224 x 2488. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 2 TB.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots way better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13. They have a 50 megapixels back-facing camera. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit better battery life than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.