Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is slightly better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a score of 76 against 73.4. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a little sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 2 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 23% more battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 takes a bit better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot less mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.