Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is just a bit heavier and a little thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB and more internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.