Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 is better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with an 87.3 score against 73.4. Xiaomi Poco F3's body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F3 has older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a little faster processor than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Poco F3 has a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a less MP camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.