Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| -- | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F5 has a score of 78.2, which is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13's global score of 73.4. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F5 has an older 13 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Poco F5's construction is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13.
Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a way better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Poco F5 also has more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Poco F5. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F5, and although they both have the same internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a battery life that's just as good as the battery duration in OSCAL Tiger 13.
Xiaomi Poco F5 takes better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a lot higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.