| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a 78.2 score against 73.4. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a somewhat thicker but just a little lighter device than OSCAL Tiger 13.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen density and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 features longer battery life than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.