Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 8.36 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a general score of 82.2, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 design is a little bit lighter but just a bit thicker than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a more vivid display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixels number per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13. They have a same resolution back camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 and OSCAL Tiger 13 count with very similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.