Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a 76.6 score against 73.4. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's construction is a little lighter but just a bit thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a brighter display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a battery lifetime that's just as good as OSCAL Tiger 13's battery duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with less mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.