Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has an overall score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13's score of 73.4. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Axon 10 Pro has the older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a somewhat lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a brighter display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a little bit more memory to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has better battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.