Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Ochre and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a score of 76.6, which is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a just a little thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version, offering some extra features.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lower 48 megapixels resolution camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features improved battery performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.