Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 11 has an overall score of 76, which is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's score of 73.4. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 11 has the older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. ZTE Axon 11's body is lighter and a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The ZTE Axon 11 features just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. ZTE Axon 11 has a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
ZTE Axon 11 features a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a back facing camera with way more MP. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 2 TB, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has 256 GB internal memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has longer battery life than ZTE Axon 11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.