Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.70 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Aqua and Black |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 32000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 13.59 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 8.36 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a general score of 79.9 against 73.4. The ZTE Axon 30 5G design is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 30 5G has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
The ZTE Axon 30 5G has a very superior CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The ZTE Axon 30 5G counts with a much more vibrant display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a higher pixel density, a little larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The ZTE Axon 30 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a little better battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.