Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a 78.1 score against 73.4. These phones have Android OS, but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a just a bit lighter and a little thinner cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a higher display pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a little better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a little better battery life than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.