Compare phones
Samsung Chrono
SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A| Global Score | |
| 33.1 | 36.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Palm | Samsung |
| Palm OS 5.4 | -- |
| 2008-02-19 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.22 x 2.10 x 0.73 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 3.14 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 225.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 2 inches |
| 320 x 320 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 206 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Intel (Single-Core 312 MHz) processor | processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 5.94 |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 526 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.8 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Chrono is a bit better than Palm Centro, having a general score of 36.1 against 33.1. Samsung Chrono is a just a bit thinner and way lighter phone than Palm Centro. Palm Centro and Samsung Chrono feature quite similar screens, although the Samsung Chrono has a just a little inferior number of pixels per display inch, a little bit lower 320 x 240 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display.
Samsung Chrono counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games as Palm Centro, although the Samsung Chrono has no external memory slot. The Palm Centro has a little better processing power than Samsung Chrono, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more processing cores.
The Palm Centro counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 44 percent larger battery size. Palm Centro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Chrono, because it has a way better resolution back facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Chrono is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.