Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 34.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Palm | Motorola |
| Palm OS 5.4 | -- |
| 2006-10-12 | 2010-07-30 |
| 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.80 inches | 3.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| $ 125.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 320 x 320 pixels | 220 x 176 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 206 pixels per inch | 128 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 312 MHz) processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 6.12 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 65,54 MB internal memory | -- |
| MMC, SD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.5 | 0.76 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 352 x 288 video resolution | -- |
| 3.63 | 4.51 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 430 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola GRASP has a general score of 34.5, which is just a bit better than the Palm Treo 680's global score of 31.4. Motorola GRASP is a notably newer device, and it's also thinner and noticeably lighter than the Palm Treo 680. The Palm Treo 680 features a brighter display than Motorola GRASP, because it has a lot better 320 x 320 resolution and a way greater pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The Palm Treo 680 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola GRASP, because it has a greater number of cores. Motorola GRASP has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Palm Treo 680. Motorola GRASP captures greater pictures and videos than Palm Treo 680, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 1.3 megapixels resolution.
The Palm Treo 680 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola GRASP, because it has 1200mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola GRASP is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.