Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 32.9 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Palm | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 | -- |
| 2007-01-07 | 2009-02-16 |
| 4.37 x 2.28 x 0.86 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 80.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 240 x 240 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 154 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 5.4 |
| Samsung (Single-Core 300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 128 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 6.12 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| miniSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung E2210 is slightly better than the Palm Treo 750 / 750v, having a 34.1 score against 32.9. Samsung E2210's design is a lot newer, thinner and way lighter than the Palm Treo 750 / 750v. The Palm Treo 750 / 750v features a little more vivid screen than Samsung E2210, because it has a higher screen density and a lot higher 240 x 240 resolution.
The Samsung E2210 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Palm Treo 750 / 750v, although it has no SD extension slot. The Palm Treo 750 / 750v features just a bit better processing power than Samsung E2210, because it has a larger number of cores. The Palm Treo 750 / 750v captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung E2210, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 1.3 MP resolution.
Palm Treo 750 / 750v counts with a way better battery life than Samsung E2210, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung E2210 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.