Search


Compare phones

Global Score
37.741.4
Basic Information
PalmNokia
Windows Mobile Professional 6.1Symbian 9.3
2008-08-202009-05-06
4.49 x 2.36 x 0.53 inches4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches
4.69 ounces3.46 ounces
$ 300.00$ 190.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
320 x 320 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
206 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
6.36.4
Performance
Qualcomm MSM7201 chipset--
Single-Core 400 MHz processorARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor
128 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
6.396.75
Storage
--61,44 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.5
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.735.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
3.33.5
Battery Life
1500mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
672 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
3.283.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPSGPS
--Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Nokia E52 has a score of 41.4, which is better than Palm Treo Pro's overall score of 37.7. Nokia E52's body is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than Palm Treo Pro, even though they were released with only 9 months difference. The Nokia E52 works with Symbian 9.3 OS, while Palm Treo Pro counts with Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 OS.

The Nokia E52 counts with a little better performance than Palm Treo Pro. Both have a Single-Core processor. Nokia E52 has a little bit better looking display than Palm Treo Pro, although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density and a quite lower 320 x 240 resolution. The Nokia E52 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Palm Treo Pro.

Nokia E52 counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the battery duration in Palm Treo Pro. The Nokia E52 counts with a superior camera than Palm Treo Pro, because it has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia E52 is also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.