Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.7 | 32.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Panasonic | Nokia |
| 2005-02-14 | 2012-05-15 |
| 4.02 x 2.09 x 1.02 inches | 4.35 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 3.02 ounces |
| $ 2680.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.4 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 16 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.67 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| miniSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| 4.84 | 4.4 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1660mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 860 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | 839 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 3.12 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 112 is a bit better than Panasonic SA7, getting a global score of 32.6 against 29.7. Nokia 112 is a notably newer phone, and it is also notably lighter and extremely thinner than the Panasonic SA7. The Panasonic SA7 features a bit better processing power than Nokia 112. They have 0 cpu cores.
The Nokia 112 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Panasonic SA7, although it has a lot lower 160 x 128 resolution. The Nokia 112 has a much greater memory for games and applications than Panasonic SA7, although it has only 10,24 MB internal memory capacity. The Panasonic SA7 counts with superior battery duration than Nokia 112, because it has a 1660mAh battery capacity instead of 1400mAh.
The Panasonic SA7 has a slightly better camera than Nokia 112, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Nokia 112 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.