Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.2 | 29.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Panasonic | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0 |
| -- | 2004-11-02 |
| 3.62 x 1.96 x 0.94 inches | 4.29 x 1.92 x 0.74 inches |
| 3.17 ounces | 3.53 ounces |
| $ 1269.00 | $ 349.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 3,07 MB internal memory | 6,14 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.20 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.4 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 260 hours standby time 11 hours talk time | 150 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 3230 is a little bit better than the Panasonic X300, with a overall score of 29.5 against 27.2. Nokia 3230 is a heavier but way thinner phone than Panasonic X300. Nokia 3230 counts with a display that's very similar to the Panasonic X300 one, although the Nokia 3230 also has a way higher 208 x 176 pixels resolution.
Nokia 3230's CPU is just as good as the Panasonic X300 one, both have the same number of cores. The Nokia 3230 features a lot better camera than Panasonic X300, because it has a back facing camera with much more megapixels. Nokia 3230 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Panasonic X300, because it has 6,14 MB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB.
The Panasonic X300 features just a bit longer battery life than Nokia 3230, because it has 780mAh of battery capacity instead of 760mAh.
The Nokia 3230 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.