Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.2 | 29.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Panasonic | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2005-09-26 |
| 3.62 x 1.96 x 0.94 inches | 4.09 x 1.97 x 0.78 inches |
| 3.17 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| $ 1269.00 | $ 269.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 3,07 MB internal memory | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 780mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 260 hours standby time 11 hours talk time | 245 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.72 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
Nokia 3250 has a global score of 29.4, which is slightly better than the Panasonic X300's score of 27.2. The Nokia 3250 construction is incredibly heavier but thinner than Panasonic X300. The Nokia 3250 counts with a little sharper display than Panasonic X300, because it has a much higher resolution of 208 x 176px.
The Nokia 3250 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Panasonic X300, because it has 10,24 MB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 3250 and Panasonic X300 both feature very similar processors, both have a 0-Core processing unit. Nokia 3250 counts with a very superior battery life than Panasonic X300, because it has a 1100mAh battery size against 780mAh.
Nokia 3250 counts with a greater camera than Panasonic X300, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Nokia 3250 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.