Search


Compare phones

Pantech Caper

TXT8035PP

HP iPAQ 600

600, 614, 614c
Pantech Caper
Global Score
29.636
Basic Information
PantechHP
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.0
--2007-09-05
4.40 x 2.40 x 0.50 inches4.60 x 2.37 x 0.68 inches
3.50 ounces5.11 ounces
Black--
$ 49.00$ 49.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.8 inches
220 x 176 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.65.8
processorMarvell PXA270 (Single-Core 520 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
Camera
1.30 MP3.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
4.515.06
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.13.3
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery1590mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.483.44
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

HP iPAQ 600 is way better than the Pantech Caper, getting a 36 score against 29.6. Although it's the best phone in this review, the HP iPAQ 600 is a noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier phone than the Pantech Caper. The HP iPAQ 600 has a quite superior processing power than Pantech Caper, because it has a greater number of cores.

HP iPAQ 600 has a little more vivid display than Pantech Caper, because it has a bigger display, a little higher pixel density and a better 320 x 240 resolution. HP iPAQ 600 features as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Pantech Caper. The HP iPAQ 600 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Pantech Caper, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.

The HP iPAQ 600 counts with a very superior battery performance than Pantech Caper, because it has a 1590mAh battery size.

The HP iPAQ 600 costs exactly the same than the Pantech Caper, which makes it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.