Global Score | |
31 | 33.7 |
Basic Information | |
Pantech | Motorola |
2010-10-27 | 2011-05-13 |
4.30 x 2.30 x 0.50 inches | 4.20 x 2.30 x 0.60 inches |
4.30 ounces | 4.00 ounces |
-- | Black |
$ 200.00 | $ 80.00 |
Display / Screen | |
3 inches | 2 inches |
240 x 400 pixels | 220 x 176 pixels |
TFT | TFT |
155 pixels per inch | 141 pixels per inch |
Yes | No touch screen |
5.9 | 5.7 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
-- | 8,19 MB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
1.32 | 0.2 |
Camera | |
3.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
5.06 | 3.63 |
CDMA | -- |
0.1 | 0 |
Battery Life | |
1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1130mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
324 hours standby time 5.2 hours talk time | 100 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
2.72 | 2.8 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
GPS | GPS |
-- | FM Radio |
The Motorola Clutch + i475 has a general score of 33.7, which is a bit better than the Pantech Crux's overall score of 31. The Motorola Clutch + i475 design is somewhat thicker but just a little bit lighter than Pantech Crux, and both were only released 7 months apart. The Motorola Clutch + i475 and Pantech Crux both have quite similar CPUs, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.
The Pantech Crux counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a lot larger display, a lot better 400 x 240px resolution and a quite better amount of pixels per display inch. The Pantech Crux counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 32 GB.
Motorola Clutch + i475 counts with just a little better battery duration than Pantech Crux, because it has a 1130mAh battery capacity. The Pantech Crux captures a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a lot better 3 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Clutch + i475 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.