Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3134
Basic Information
PantechNokia
2010-10-272008-06-27
4.30 x 2.30 x 0.50 inches3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches
4.30 ounces4.37 ounces
$ 200.00$ 185.00
Display / Screen
3 inches2.2 inches
240 x 400 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
155 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
YesNo touch screen
5.96.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--25,6 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.320.3
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
5.065.17
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
1100mAh Li-Ion Battery870mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
324 hours standby time
5.2 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.722.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 7510 Supernova is just a bit better than Pantech Crux, with a score of 34 against 31. Although it's the best in this review, we must note that it's also a much older, just a little bit heavier and noticeably thicker device. The Pantech Crux and the Nokia 7510 Supernova count with extremely similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores.

The Nokia 7510 Supernova counts with a bit better screen than Pantech Crux, because although it has a bit worse 320 x 240px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density. Pantech Crux counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Nokia 7510 Supernova.

Nokia 7510 Supernova captures slightly better photos and videos than Pantech Crux, although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP resolution. Pantech Crux counts with superior battery duration than Nokia 7510 Supernova, because it has a 1100mAh battery capacity against 870mAh.

Even being the best phone in this comparison, Nokia 7510 Supernova is also the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.