Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3134
Basic Information
PantechNokia
--Symbian 9.1
2010-10-272006-09-26
4.30 x 2.30 x 0.50 inches3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches
4.30 ounces4.35 ounces
$ 200.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
3 inches2.4 inches
240 x 400 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
155 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
YesNo touch screen
5.96.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--61,44 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
1.320.5
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
5.065.5
CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
1100mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
324 hours standby time
5.2 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
2.722.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0
GPS--
--Infra-red port
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia N75 is a little bit better than the Pantech Crux, with a score of 34 against 31. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must tell that it's also a older, just a bit heavier and much thicker phone. The Nokia N75's CPU is very similar to Pantech Crux's processor, both have a 0-Core processor.

The Nokia N75 features a little sharper display than Pantech Crux, because although it has a bit lower 320 x 240 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little better count of pixels per inch in the display. The Pantech Crux features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Nokia N75.

The Pantech Crux has a really longer battery life than Nokia N75, because it has a 1100mAh battery capacity instead of 800mAh. Nokia N75 counts with a little bit better camera than Pantech Crux, although it has a lot lower resolution back camera.

The Nokia N75 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.