Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | Samsung |
| 2009-10-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.19 x 2.04 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.49 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 400 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 179 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 81,92 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.82 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.84 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 930mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 336 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is way better than Pantech Impact, with an 83.8 score against 31.2. Galaxy A50 is a newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Pantech Impact, but it is also much heavier. The Galaxy A50 has a way better screen than Pantech Impact, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a much higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a really bigger display.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Pantech Impact, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features a way better hardware performance than Pantech Impact, because it has a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery life than Pantech Impact, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 930mAh. The Galaxy A50 captures much clearer photos and videos than Pantech Impact, because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little more expensive than the Pantech Impact, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.