Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.334
Basic Information
PantechNokia
--Symbian 9.1
--2006-09-26
4.50 x 2.40 x 0.39 inches3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches
3.30 ounces4.35 ounces
$ 150.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.4 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
167 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
66.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
204,8 MB internal memory61,44 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.80.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
4.735.5
UMTS, EDGE and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.4
Battery Life
1000mAh Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
2.562.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 2.0
--Infra-red port
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia N75 has a global score of 34, which is slightly better than the Pantech Link II's global score of 31.3. The Nokia N75 is a much heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than Pantech Link II. The Nokia N75 has a bit sharper display than Pantech Link II. Both have the same display pixel density, a display of the same size and exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.

The Pantech Link II counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia N75, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Nokia N75's processing unit is very similar to Pantech Link II's CPU, both of them have 0 processing cores.

The Nokia N75 has a superior camera than Pantech Link II. Both of them have the same resolution camera in the back. The Pantech Link II has improved battery performance than Nokia N75, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity.

Nokia N75 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.